高级检索

LiteratiPath:大规模宋代文人迁徙可视分析系统

LiteratiPath: A Visual Analytics System for Large-scale Migration Paths of Song Dynasty Literati

  • 摘要: 历史文人迁徙轨迹是研究中国古代社会文化流动与区域互动的关键载体,其时空模式深刻关联着个体命运与时代变迁。针对现有大规模文人迁徙轨迹工作存在路径交叉重叠,导致视觉混乱、深度关联分析工具不足,以及可交互性低的问题,通过与古代文学专家合作,提出一套大规模宋代文人迁徙可视分析系统LiteratiPath。首先设计自适应路径边绑定(AEPB)算法优化大规模迁徙轨迹的视觉表达和效率,揭示群体迁徙数据的宏观流动模式和关键路径;然后构建“城市-时间-文人-诗文”四维数据关联模型,融合椭圆核密度分析、迁徙指数计算和诗词主题挖掘技术,实现迁徙动态定量计算与空间主题关联挖掘;最后设计可视化图符和多视图协同交互机制,实现迁徙模式渐进探索。在宋代文人迁徙数据集上进行定量分析,并面向12位文学研究者开展案例分析,结果表明,与其他算法相比,AEPB算法优化了视觉质量、效率与绑定效果,在失真度和歧义性指标上最优;在用户实验中,所提方法和系统为历史人文工作提供了新的分析视角与工具支持。

     

    Abstract: The migration trajectories of historical literati are a key carrier for studying the sociocultural mobility and regional interaction in ancient China, and their spatiotemporal patterns are deeply linked to individual destinies and the changes of the times. Aiming at the problems of existing large-scale literati migration trajectory research, such as path overlapping leading to visual clutter, insufficient tools for in-depth association analysis, and low interactivity, we collaborated with experts in ancient literature and proposed a large-scale visual analysis system, LiteratiPath, for the migration of literati in the Song Dynasty. First, an Adaptive Edge Path Bundling (AEPB) algorithm was designed to optimize the visual representation and efficiency of large-scale migration trajectories, revealing the macroscopic flow patterns and key paths of group migration data. Then, a four-dimensional data association model of "city-time-literati-poetry" was constructed, integrating elliptical kernel density analysis, migration index calculation, and poetry topic mining techniques to realize the quantitative calculation of migration dynamics and the mining of spatial topic associations. Finally, visual symbols and a multi-view collaborative interaction mechanism were designed to enable progressive exploration of migration patterns. Quantitative analysis was conducted on the Song Dynasty literati migration dataset, and case studies were carried out with 12 literary researchers. The results show that compared with other algorithms, the AEPB algorithm optimizes visual quality, efficiency, and bundling effects, and performs best in terms of distortion, and ambiguity; in user experiments, the proposed method and system provide new analytical perspectives and tool support for historical humanities research.

     

/

返回文章
返回